Rooting out natural capital threats to organisations

ESG+ Matters

Rooting out natural capital threats to organisations

Eileen Gavin - 22 October 2021

Geospatial ESG investing
Learn more


The intersection of human rights, the destruction of natural capital and commodity production provides an important example of why neither corporates nor investors can no longer look at risk in silos.

Analysis for our Human Rights Outlook 2021 evidences clear links between land grabs and biodiversity loss; the poverty, corruption and weak rule of law that drive them; and how these issues enter our everyday lives.

Using our ESG data covering 170 hard and soft commodities, we identify the raw materials posing the highest risk of land grabs.

What we’ve found is an outsized risk to indigenous peoples and natural habitats stemming from a surprising range of commodities that not only provide the food we eat (such as the ubiquitous ingredient palm oil), but also the materials needed to power the energy transition, such as cobalt, zinc, bauxite and silicon.

Billions of dollars’ worth of illegally produced commodities tainted by land grabs and the destruction of natural capital are washed into global supply chains each year.

Corporates, investors and banks must be prepared to determine if their purchases (and financing) of these goods are linked to expropriated land or trashed ecosystems, otherwise the backlash could be considerable.

Unless threats to human rights in the supply chain are addressed by companies and investors, it will be increasingly hard to justify labelling the likes of EV’s, lithium-ion batteries and solar panels as ‘clean’ technology’, for instance.

Organisations and investors can mitigate risks by working within frameworks like the forthcoming Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFDs) to identify natural capital risks and then integrate those findings into corporate strategies.

A more proactive approach would see sovereign investors using capital to persuade governments to improve their ESG performance through policies that create jobs and alleviate poverty, which would have the knock-on effect of addressing land grabs and natural capital risk.

Eileen Gavin

Principal Analyst, Global Markets & Americas

Chart of the week


Quote of the week

At next month’s COP26 climate change conference I’ll be telling world leaders that it shouldn’t be the poorest nations that are left holding the bill for cleaning up our planet — and things should be no different here at home.
So while we’re going to have to make some pretty major changes to the way we heat our homes, the Greenshirts of the Boiler Police are not going to kick in your door with their sandal-clad feet and seize, at carrot-point, your trusty old combi

PM Boris Johnson

PM Boris Johnson reassures UK citizens about plans for the energy transition

What we’re reading


The week ahead

  • In the latest release from our Human Rights Outlook 2021, we examine the ESG credentials of the world’s leading destinations for FDI. Our data indicates that the human rights of citizens in 40% of the globe’s top 100 locations for FDI are at ‘high’ or ‘extreme’ risk, while overall, 75% of almost 600 cities assessed also sat within the two highest risk categories
  • Please join us for our upcoming webinar - Analysing human rights risk - From cities to supply chains - Live on 2 Nov & on-demand after
  • Geospatial ESG

    Integrate global & local ESG, climate & political factors into your sovereign debt, real asset, commodity & equity investment strategies with our data, research & advice

    Learn more

Get in touch today to discuss how we can help you…